Truly Human in a Partially Human World
What does it mean to be truly human? Without using philosophical abstractions or complex terminology, I am impelled to reflect on this question, as we celebrate the passion, death and resurrection of Jesus. The story of Jesus is one of light and darkness, good and evil, hope and fear, an ambiguous existence of living within the stream of opposites. It is a tragedy when preachers insert God into Jesus’ life, as if he were ontologically divine and appearing in human form. They say things like: “Jesus knew he was God but went to the cross knowing that he would be raised from the dead” or “God gave Jesus the power to save us on the cross.” The tragedy is the diminishment of human nature in the face of the divine. The story of Jesus is not about divinity; it is about humanity, our humanity.
Jesus was thoroughly human and thoroughly Jewish. His mission and vision were driven by a deep sense of God’s immanent, relational love, empowering his life. He grew in wisdom through faith and trust in the God of Israel. He worshipped in the Temple and followed Jewish law. He reached a point in his life when he felt called to public ministry, to preach the vision growing within him, a new Israel, a new inclusive community, a new way of being human in a new world. What makes Jesus truly human was not only his fidelity to the call but his descent into the darkness of the desert: the desert of human violence, the desert of his own heart, the darkness of false attractions. The forty days in the desert speak of a confrontation with the forces of evil, resistance to the lures of worldly power and riches, and a renewal of his “yes” to the invitation of the Spirit of God.
Jesus was not the first incarnation of divine love but the second one. Mary, a symbol of the cosmos itself, was the first yes to accepting divinity into the chaos of humanity. Divine love must be received, and receptivity requires space within. Nature does this without complaint, bending its roots toward the life of God. But humans are conflicted, tortured by an ongoing conflict between ego and freedom. To be human does not come naturally; it is a choice for love beyond measure and such love requires absolute freedom. Jesus lived into this freedom in love by overcoming darkness, refusing the limits of the law that excluded people, stretching the law to include people left out, and essentially showing us that the spirit of love is the highest law to follow. To live, authentically, according to Jesus, is to follow the compass of the heart, even when the direction goes against cultural or institutional demands.
Ultimately, it was love that got Jesus into trouble. He loved to the point of tears and did not hold back those tears in the face of death. He healed the unclean, embraced women and raised the dead to life. The humanity of Jesus reveals the openness of the soul to the infinite love of God. His humanity is our humanity; his divinity is our divinity as well. Jesus is not the great exception to what we are but the epitome of what we can become. His final discourses in the Gospel of John beautifully convey his fears and his hopes—and ours as well: “I must go,” he said, “so that the Spirit may come” (Jn 16:7); the Spirit will lead you to truth, freedom, and the heart of God. “Do not cling to me but go…” (Jn 20:17). “Whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these” (Jn 14:12). The greatest fear we have as humans is to be forgotten, an existential nightmare that ultimately leads to nothingness. We want our lives to count for something, not just in our lifetimes but after our deaths. After all, what is the value of this earthly struggle, if not for the sake of the future? The life of Jesus is not only a way to live in the present moment; it is a way into future life: “I have come that you may have life, and have it to the full.”
We all want the fullness of life but often it eludes us. We are constantly distracted by the false self, to use Thomas Merton’s term, the self that I think I need to be, and seldom committed to the true self, that self that is known by God alone, in whom my freedom lies. The passion reveals to us the difficult path of becoming truly human: facing the death of the false self, unwilling to scapegoat God by seeking alternate gods of power and wealth, standing for truth in the face of opposition, willing to forgive our enemies, and to ask forgiveness of those we have wronged, and finally, to love unto death because the God who is human can only be realized in love. Love is only an idea, a possibility, until it is chosen and brought into a new reality.
Jesus showed us that suffering through love unto a greater good, a greater hope, a greater vision, is the only way forward. “There is no other path than through the burning love of the Crucified,” Bonaventure wrote. There is no God who will come to save us; God did not save Jesus from death. God, as an overarching transcendent power, died on the cross and rose into new life, the life of the God-man. There is no God up above in the heavens; indeed, there is no extraterrestrial realm of heaven. Heaven is this world clearly seen. Heaven begins within and culminates in eternal life. The way to heaven is the way of Jesus who shows us that suffering through love unto a higher love is the path toward the fullness of life. Teresa of Avila wrote, “I die because I do not die.” Facing fear, darkness and death itself is not the end but the beginning of the fullness of life. God can only become God when we resist the forces that strangulate love.
Our culture militates against the truly human. Social media and the markets of capitalism lead us to believe that what we are is imperfect and in need of improvement. Transhumanism aims to enhance human life by overcoming our biological limits and aiming for godlike power. But Jesus shows us that it is precisely our limits that define our humanity. We fail, we do bad things, we make wrong decisions — and the tech industry promises to relieve us of these burdens. Yet it is precisely in failure that we begin anew. In the world of capitalism, we are products for consumption and algorithms for manipulation. But the core of our human identity is not appearance, usefulness, or success. It is the true self before God. “For me to be a saint is to be myself,” Merton wrote. The world we have built and buy into does not allow us to live as ourselves, with our warps and foibles; the space for forgiveness, truth, and acknowledging our failures is shrinking. Instead, we are pressured to treat ourselves as something flexible, redesignable, and sellable. If the new product is not superficially appealing, we opt out. Human dignity becomes an empty shell with no real content.
We would do well to come down from the rafters of idealism and nostalgia and face the brute reality of being human. Being human is what Jesus was about, and it is what we are called to embrace: to reconcile our constant need to scapegoat, blame others, hurl vindictive remarks and reduce others to dust — recognizing that all of these impulses reflect a split psyche and a dishonest self that is not yet fully human.
If Mary was the first incarnation of divine love, and Jesus the second, then we are called to be the third. When we walk the path Jesus walked — choosing love over power, vulnerability over control, forgiveness over vengeance — we do not merely imitate Christ; we become Christ. The divine love that was received by Mary and embodied by Jesus seeks a third dwelling place: the human person who says yes to the fullness of life, even when that yes leads through suffering.
The cross of Jesus is the symbol of this becoming. It is the place where opposites are reconciled and the soul is forged in love. It is a difficult symbol because it points to a deeper truth about our reality: that the richest moments of human life emerge in breakdown, in the darkness where the false self finally dies. We are asked to remain here, in the tension of the cross, as we make our way into freedom — confronting our own demons, reconciling the opposing energies within, and striving for wholeness of personhood. As Carl Jung noted, what is not reconciled within is projected without, and the world is forced to live with our untamed demons, our wild gods.But the cross is also where God is most fully revealed — not only in the form of love but in the entropy of death itself. Creativity thrives on entropy; only when things break down does life find a way to break through. Evolution is a via dolorosa, suffering through the tragedies of existence into something higher and more wondrous. And we, by taking up this path, become part of that cosmic unfolding — the third incarnation of a love that will not stop until it fills all things.
View print-friendly version39 Comments
Leave a Comment
Related Posts
Connection Is Not Communion: What a week at the ocean taught me about AI, evolution, and being human
I have just returned from a week at the Jersey shore and continue to reflect on my time there. Reflection allows my analytical left brain to slow down and see…
This blog is the very ointment of Holy Week I want to anoint the suffering world with it.
Beautifully said! Thank you Sister Ilia. Happy Easter!
Wow! Amen!
This is a clear speaking of the upside-down Kindom of God.
Yes, we are called to be the third incarnation. There are moments when we fulfill that call and then stumble in the next. This is not about perfection; it is about the winding path of the Wisdom/Love that is at the center of all Creation, in the heart of G-d. When we falter or fail, that love does not cast us out. It envelops us in deep embrace.
I read this on Holy Saturday. Earlier in the day, I was reflecting on being in the void, the space that comes after a loss when we have no idea what is next. I know that void intimately facing the losses of my life. In every void, as deep as it may be, there has been for me some sense of hope not for any pollyanna stance but because there has been “something” calling me to venture on.
This post speaks of that “something” in which I live and move and have my being. Thank you, Ilia.
wow, so clearly written and for me speaks truth – which I will read over several times – for this writing is packed full.
It is Holy Saturday and I am reminded about an essay by Hans Urs Von Balthasar in which he describes the descent of Jesus into hell on Holy Saturday not “Christ’s victorious entrance into the underworld but is an expression of God’s ‘radical unwillingness to abandon sinners, even where, by definition, God cannot be, insofar as hell means the utter and obstinate rejection of God.’”
“On Holy Saturday, God erects the cross in hell and shows us the unimaginable depths of God’s love and fidelity. In this way, the person who has timelessly closed himself off is opened up through the inescapable presence of another, who is just as timelessly near him and calls his presumptuous, seeming unapproachability into question.”
The theory for Von Balthasar is the vision of one who is “willing to pay any price to be with the one who completely rejects him.” This is a vision of inconceivable love, one that, in Von Balthasar’s mind, is capable of “melting even the most hardened heart, in a way that would not deny human freedom but could in its ‘weakness’ and ‘powerlessness’ persuade and compel, in its solidarity from within, those who reject all solidarity.”
This view of what is meant by Jesus’ descending in to hell is very provocative and challenging. And yet, something in me says that this is the call, the path to follow, the love to imitate. It’s not for the weak, is it? Who of us wants to be here, loving the one who rejects us? And yet, I think this is exactly where we are called to be….that troublesome “love your enemy” thing. Is this what it means to be human?
Thank you so much, Ilia!
This is a wonderful text! It’s exactly how I feel too.
Happy Easter!
Thank you for this beautiful and meaning-full reflection.
However, I find these first, second and third incarnations quite confusing. Every incarnation of the God Who is Love is an incarnation of Love. Love exists before the beginning of space and time. I believe that Love chose to incarnate at the beginning of space and time. If so, it does not make sense, at least to me, to speak of first, second and third incarnations. The God of Love is always incarnating both in the nonhuman and human worlds. Humans can choose to manifest that Love, but the Love remains at their center no matter whether they choose to manifest it or not. May more and more humans choose to manifest that Love at their center. Such Love is desperately needed in our world today.
Wow! This is a meditation. I will have to read over and over because it contains notions that I have not considered even with graduate degrees in divinity in theology thank you.
Ilia, outstanding reflection. I would posit that Mary is the second incarnation because I recreation as the first incarnation. Blessings, Joseph
Interesting thought that collaborates your emphasis on love. David Hawkins defined love (and I’m paraphrasing him) as being both an emotion and a state of being and relating to the world. Yeshua was the embodiment of the Greek Agape, unconditional love. Would that the world could be so embodied!